Readiness check and use-case selection
Two to three working sessions with the people who do the work, followed by a short written report. The result is a decision, not a vision.
Most companies do not need an AI strategy of eighty pages. They need to know which three tasks are worth automating, what it costs to run, where their data goes, and who checks the result. A4IT answers those questions and then builds the answer into the systems you already use.
Two to three working sessions with the people who do the work, followed by a short written report. The result is a decision, not a vision.
Language models as a component of an application, with the same engineering standards as the rest of the code: versioned, tested, logged and replaceable.
Retrieval-augmented generation: the model answers from your manuals, contracts, tickets and procedures, and shows the passage it used.
A model that can use tools: look something up, fill in a form, create a ticket, prepare an order. Useful, and only safe with clear limits.
For data that may not leave the building, or volumes where a meter per token becomes expensive.
The part that decides whether a pilot becomes daily practice.
Only if you decide so. We set up provider accounts in your name with the settings that exclude your data from training, and for sensitive material we run models locally. Which data goes where is written down before the pilot starts.
We do not know before we measure, and nobody else does either. A pilot starts with a test set from your own cases; the result on that set is the figure you decide on.
Running cost is part of the use-case score. For hosted models it depends on volume and model choice; for local models on hardware. You get an estimate per function per month, and a dashboard that shows the real figure afterwards.
Yes. A4IT builds, hosts and maintains the solution if you want that, and trains your staff to use it. See software development and cloud & PaaS.
No. We keep the model behind an interface so it can be replaced, and we have no reseller agreement that makes one provider more attractive to us than another.
We list your AI systems, map each one to the Act's risk categories and note the obligations that seem to apply. That is preparation for your legal adviser, not a replacement.