Inventory and assessment
Before anything moves: what is there, what is still used and what depends on what.
A4IT reads COBOL, DB2, JCL, CICS and IMS applications, writes down what they really do and moves them to Java or .NET on PostgreSQL or SQL Server, one function at a time. Reverse engineering comes first: an inventory, the data flows and the business rules, in documents your own people can check. The old system keeps running until the new one gives the same results. You work directly with Tim De Smedt, without middlemen.
Before anything moves: what is there, what is still used and what depends on what.
The knowledge is in the code and in a few heads. We put it on paper while both are still available.
Language models read COBOL faster than people do. They also get it wrong, so every result is checked against the code.
Often the first step is not to replace anything, but to let new software reach what is there.
One function at a time moves to a platform that developers are easy to find for. See software development.
From DB2 to PostgreSQL or SQL Server, with proof that nothing was lost or silently changed.
A migration is finished when the new system gives the same answers, not when the code compiles.
No. Sometimes documenting the system and putting interfaces around it is the right result. The inventory shows what is worth moving; the decision is yours, per component.
That depends on the size, on how the parts depend on each other and on how much time your people have to review. After the inventory you get a plan in steps with an estimate per step. We name no duration before that.
Tools help with the inventory and the analysis. The new code is written by developers from the documented rules, because converted code tends to be COBOL in another syntax that nobody wants to maintain.
Only if you approve it. The analysis can run on a local model, on a service you approved, or without language models at all. See AI consulting.
Reverse engineering, while they can still check the result. Documentation they have reviewed is worth more than any reconstruction afterwards.
Tim De Smedt and the core development team, directly. You follow it through the documents, regular demos and an issue list you can open at any time. See how we work and project management & analysis.